BBC Philharmonic & Gianandrea Noseda - Liszt: Symphonic Poems Volume 1 (2005) [Hi-Res]

26 May, 19:20
change text size:

Artist: BBC Philharmonic & Gianandrea Noseda
Title: Liszt: Symphonic Poems Volume 1
Year Of Release: 2005
Label: Chandos
Genre: Classical
Quality: FLAC (tracks) 24bit/96kHz / Digital Booklet
Total Time: 01:18:53
Total Size: 1,28 GB
WebSite: Album Preview

Tracklist:

Franz Liszt (1811-1886)

Ce Qu'on Entend Sur la Montagne (What Is Heard On The Mountain), S95/R412
1 Poco Allegro - Poco A Poco Piu di Moto 5:42
2 Allegro Maestoso, Sempre Alla Breve 4:16
3 Allegro Agitato Assai 3:37
4 Andante Religioso - Allegro Moderato (alla Breve) 5:39
5 Allegro. Poco A Poco Piu di Moto 11:27

Tasso: Lamento E Trionfo, S96/R413
6 Lento - Allegro Strepitoso - Lento 8:36
7 Meno Adagio 2:02
8 Allegretto Mosso Con Grazia 4:32
9 Allegro Con Molto Brio 4:44

Les Preludes, S97/R414
10 Andante - Andante Maestoso 6:30
11 Allegro Ma Non Troppo 3:23
12 Allegretto Pastorale 6:11

13 Orpheus, S98/R415 11:35

Performers:

BBC Philharmonic
Gianandrea Noseda

Where vigour and energy matter, Gianandrea Noseda and the BBC Philharmonic sometimes achieve effective results - the concluding triumph of Tasso sounds genuinely grand under Noseda, painfully stilted under Haitink - and, thankfully, this performance of Les Préludes stresses flow over pomposity. — BBC Music Magazine, October 2005

**********

ABOUT THE ALBUM
1 disc(s) - 13 track(s)
Total length: 01:18:39
Main artist: Gianandrea Noseda
Composer: Franz Liszt
Label: Chandos
Area: Hongrie
Genre: Klassiek Symfonische muziek Symfonische gedichten
Period: Musique Romantique
Hi-Res 24-Bit 96.0 kHz - Stereo
Digital booklet
(c) 2005 Chandos

**********

DOWNLOAD LINKS on ISRA.CLOUD
--- PLEASE DO NOT UPLOAD ELSEWHERE ---

DOWNLOAD [.Hi-Res]

olga1001
19:53
- 1

Thanks for 24-96 :)
Let's complete this series in 24-96 until Vol. 5 !

ответить цитировать

hollinsuk
20:36
- 0

Many thanks for attempting to share with us.

I will not be downloading this music as you are offering crazily high bit rates (wonder if anyone can discern the quality difference?).

My 1 tb external hard drive can store at least 2,500 FLAC files - your high bit rates would reduce this number to half, without any noticeable difference in music quality.

My priority is for more music but at sufficient quality that is acceptable to my well-used and tuned ears.

Do hope that you offer a 320 kbps or FLAC (but not at too hi-res bitrates) offering in the near future.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Cheers,

Douglas (UK)

olga1001
20:59
- 2

@hollinsuk
How about changing DAC ?
Latest DAC will make you discern the difference :))
I have already 12 HDDs for 8TB also for video :p
Good luck

JLIsrabox
16:28
- 2

@hollinsuk: 24bit 96khz is not a "crazy high bit rate". It is considered by many to be standard audiophile high resolution. It does make a difference with certain kinds of music. And there are 2 components here: the bit rate and the sampling frequency. 24bits is always desirable. 96khz is where I personally draw the line. I do otherwise find 192khz and higher frequencies to be unnecessary for my ears, especially when then they also take up much more disk space.

Rather than put the burden on posters who generously make the effort to share the music, I would suggest you make a small investment in software like dbPowerAmp so you can easily and quickly resample and convert the higher-resolution music to whatever more degraded form you prefer. That's what I do with 192khz and higher formats, including ISO, DSF, DFF, multi-channel, etc.

SpotiledMogrant
23:20
- 0

Syringe for Hollins, nurse. And plenty of suds...splosh it about.